Writing recently about the coming of the New Year, I admitted to loving “the image of the blank slate, the fresh canvas, the empty page. The thought of turning from the past and moving into a pristine future is deeply appealing. Like feet of freshly-fallen snow, a new year blankets the disappointments and pain, conflicts and loss of the old with beauty and peace. Glinting in the sunlight, piled high on fenceposts and streets, whorling into intricate patterns against parking lots and sheds, the fresh emptiness of snow gives the illusion of clarity and simplicity. Clean as a fresh canvas, empty as a page still waiting for words, it tempts us toward an imagined world free of complexity and ambiguity, a world reduced to the twin realities of sunlight and shadow.”
From time to time each of us hungers for the simplicity and clarity of a fresh start, and the New Year is a traditional time to acknowledge and assuage that hunger. In this week’s Write on Wednesday prompt, Becca narrows the focus a bit by asking, ”What fresh ideas do you have for your writing?” For a writer, the metaphoric hunger for an empty slate, a blank page free of stunted paragraphs, unfinished sentences and untidy piles of words can be almost visceral. When desks pile high with false starts, orphaned phrases and errant thoughts that refuse to lead to any good conclusion, the sense of frustration can be suffocating. When it comes to a fresh start, writers’ block is not precisely the issue. Writer’s boredom seems a more adequate description. There is a certain ennui, a stifling lassitude, a distaste for one’s own thoughts that leads inexorably to that particular dead end called “I don’t have anything original to say.”
![]()
Granted, originality is tricky business. Foregoing any concern for originality in order to write “what appeals to the masses” leads directly into the heart of literary tract housing where rows of bland, predictable and stolid manuscripts reach off to the horizon. On the other hand, a writer determined to ”be original” in every detail and at all costs can end up producing the literary equivalent to a purple house with green shutters and gargoyles on the roof. It’s memorable, but not necessarily attractive. Striking a balance, speaking with a voice both appealing and memorable, is one of the most difficult things in the world.
Anyone who’s attempted to please a thesis advisor knows precisely how difficult originality can be. When the pressure is not merely to publish, but to publish something which never before has been, the truth of the old joke about dissertations takes on life. The search for a “completely original” thesis – an academic blank slate, if you will - leads to a continual narrowing of focus. As the writer says more and more about less and less, the eventual result is saying everything about nothing at all. Even in academia, that isn’t creative originality, but quirky irrelevance.
![]()
Dealing with intertwined issues of creativity, originality and renewal is difficult partly because of our tendency to reject the constraints of history. In our writing as in our lives, we are creatures of time, decision and consequence. Even in writing, all of the bad decisions, every false start, each of the anguished choices is important. Wrong words, half-baked sentences and inadequate descriptions are not mistakes but vibrant parts of the creative process. Whatever use we make of them, even if we merely set them aside, they help to clarify vision and deepen understanding, and should not be denied. In the same way, attempting to reject our indebtedness to past writers, to wipe the slate clean of every influence or unwind every tendril of literary relationship in order to claim a spurious originality is simple foolishness. It is no more achievable than the chimeral world of pure sunlight and shadow we find so appealing, and no more satisfying in the end.
Literary creation never is sui generis. Believing our words to be purely our own, unsullied by the contaminating presence of others is at best an innocent conceit, and at worst a heartbreaking delusion. As we move into our new year, determined to make a fresh start, we may face blank pages, but we ourselves are not blank slates. We carry our history within us, and we are embedded in time. Our task not to invent something entirely new, but to build on the foundation of the past as we construct our own works. At this point, at least, there is no decision to be made. Truly creative work will be grounded in the words of other writers, the interpretation of critics, the assorted imaginings of dreamers and the tattered and fragmented realities of our own lives. The words, the history and our tiny bits of life already are given. Their shape, their pattern and finally their resonance and truth require nothing more than a skillful hand and an attentive heart to rearrange them.

I always have loved kaleidoscopes. Holding one to the light, turning it just so, I’m transfixed as I watch the bits of colored glass form an infinite number of patterns. Rosabeth Kanter, a specialist in strategy, innovation and leadership for Harvard Business School, knows a thing or two herself about fresh starts, and she understands the power of kaleidoscopic images. “Creativity”, says Ms. Kanter, ”is a lot like looking at the world through a kaleidoscope. You look at a set of elements, the same ones everyone else sees, but then reassemble those floating bits and pieces into an enticing new possibility.” In the same way, it is the task of writers to hold up reality to the lights of intellect, imagination, and creative passion, turning it this way, and that, until words fall into place and their newly-formed patterns sparkle with beauty and meaning.
Reading my own writings from the past year, remembering the birth of phrases and the tumbles of words like a doting parent, I see their paragraphs and pages not as static and sequential, frozen in time and forever fixed, but vibrant and alive, broken up and fragmented by circumstance, tossed up and falling out, a confetti of meaning both perfectly familiar and terrifyingly unique.
As I gather my scattered words to make a fresh start in this new year that lies still empty as a page, it is this kaleidoscopic vision I seek. I’m ready to give life a turn.
![]()







Once again you simply amaze me with your thoughts, and with the beauty of your writing. I love the ideas you’ve expressed here – the way our writing is a kaliedoscopic mingling of our past experiences. I’ve just read a biography of Eudora Welty, and this idea appears in her thoughts about her own writing.
Thank you so much for this wonderful contribution of fresh ideas!
Becca,
If Eudora Welty is also thinking such thoughts, I need to get back to her and do a bit more reading. I’ve always enjoyed her work and her musings. If you think the bio good, drop me a note and let me know the title.
I’ve been thinking about the kaleidoscope for some time. I have a wonderful photo in my files that was taken one day after Ike on a Galveston beach. In a huge pile of sand there was a little pink plastic kaleidoscope. I took it as a direct sign from my muse that the kaleidescope was to be my totem, that I was on the right path when I thought of writing in that way. The funniest thing about that toy kaleidoscope is that the eyepiece was intact, but the other end, where the bits of plastic would be, had come out. So, when you hold that particular kaleidoscope up to your eye, what you see is reality. It makes me laugh every time I do it, and I do look through it every now and then – keep it right here on my desk!
Thanks for stopping by, and such kind words.
Linda
Beautiful, beautiful. . . I have always thought of writing as a mosaic made up words new and borrowed . . . never standing alone but always as part of this greater story that all of us are writing together. Thank you so much.
Andi,
I keep coming back to that old slogan that came out a few years ago – you can do everything, you just can’t do everything at once. In the same way, we all have so much to say. We just can’t say it all at once. That’s what makes groups like Write on Wednesday so interesting and so important – we play off one another, stimulate one another, encourage one another’s creativity so that every one is able to speak their “current word” clearly. It’s really fun!
Thanks for stopping by. Enjoy the coming week,
Linda
It was an interesting way to look at writing. A kaleidoscope. I had a kaleidoscope as a kid. I used to try to see the end of the image.
I don’t know if I agree with the image of a kaleidoscope. I’ve never felt that writing has anything to do about how I see the world. I’ve rather felt it is a matter of ability to put words on it. Some use paint, others use musical instruments or a camera. Most don’t try.
My father, whose whole life has been like a kaleidoscope in rotation, cannot write his life story because – as he described it – he cannot write as fast as the thoughts come and it ends up like wasps’ nest inside him.
Writing is a way to slow things down, to stop the revolving of the world for an eternity moment.
Desiree,
After some thought, I’ve decided we’re actually rather close in understanding. Things are always imprecise when metaphor is involved, but if I had to try, I would say that the “kaleidoscope” is the process of turning things around and seeing the world differently. Then, once things have fallen into the new pattern, the writing is a way to try and capture that new arrangement of “bits”.
And writing absolutely is a way to slow things down. I’ve always imagined my writing as my way of saying to a reader, “Come over here for a minute. There’s something I’d like to show you”. It’s like that magic moment when the butterfly or hummingbird finally lands, and stays put, and you have a chance to look – really look – at it before it takes off again. The great irony is that if a painting or photograph or poem captures the moment perfectly, it will set our own thoughts flying off – that’s where I understand your Father. Sometimes I respond to a piece of art – screenplay, essay, photo – with multiple thoughts. If I don’t get them on paper immediately, they’re just gone. Some come back, some don’t!
Thanks so much for stopping by – I always enjoy your comments.
Linda
While “cruising” alphainventions.com, your blog gave me pause. So much so, that I clicked your link, just to read more.
You have a beautiful way of making words dance; I found myself mesmerized by this post.
Now that my curiosity has been piqued, I will spend a few more moments “getting to know you”.
I’m so glad I found your blog!
Adonya
Adonya Wong
Author | Autism Blogger
Adonya,
Thank you so much for your comments. I’ve only recently been picked up by AlphaInventions, and it’s a delight to discover there are “real” people out there who are reading.
I’m so glad you enjoyed the piece, and I truly appreciate your kind words. From the beginning, my intent has been to be a writer who utilizes the advantages of a blogging platform. I don’t post as often as many, and my approach as a “web essayist” is a little different, but I’m pleased with the way things are developing.
Please do stop by again. I try to post at least every 4 days or so, and address a variety of topics. And, best wishes for your book and your own site!
Linda
“I see their paragraphs and pages not as static and sequential, frozen in time and forever fixed, but vibrant and alive, broken up and fragmented by circumstance, tossed up and falling out, a confetti of meaning both perfectly familiar and terrifyingly unique.”
I love this image of the kaleidoscope as a metaphor for writing- or the creative process behind writing. It could be used as a writing exercise where you take one prompt and try to write from as many angles or different perspectives as possible.
Kim,
It certainly could be used as such a prompt – and very effectively, I would think.
One of the great beauties of the kaleidoscopic approach is that it eliminates the need to keep piling up experiences, insights, relationships and such in order to have something “new” to write about. A twist of the tube, and the finite number of colored bits in the kaleidoscope arrange themselves into a new pattern. A “twist” of the details, the plot, the setting, the characters, and an entirely new scene is set.
Give reality a spin, and the ordinary may become extraordinary, indeed.
Thanks so much for taking the time to stop by and leave a comment. I really do appreciate it.
Linda
“Truly creative work will be grounded in the words of other writers, the interpretation of critics, the assorted imaginings of dreamers and the tattered and fragmented realities of our own lives. The words, the history and our tiny bits of life already are given.”
Well said… and that’s why I don’t believe there can be purely “neutral reporting” or “objective criticism”.
The metaphor of the kaleidoscope is an interesting idea. Thanks for introducing something fresh for us to ponder in the start of a new year, Linda.
Arti,
So much to ponder, so little time! On “your” issue of criticism, it did occur to me the best justification for yet another review, another exploration of a writer like Jane Austen lies precisely in the fact that we bring our own life, experience and understanding to the reading of a classic text. Every new reader makes the possibility of renewed appreciation possible. You certainly make everything from literature to architecture lively – and fun! It will be a delight to see what the new year brings us.
Linda
Linda, Like many of your other entries, this one deserves to be read several times. And again, later. Very rich. I love the line (well, many but especially) about “literary tract housing.” Geez, it’s difficult to be real and fresh every time one writes, but that is, after all, the brass ring.
oh,
I could be so wrong about this, but I have a sense that if the first priority is “real”, then “fresh” will take care of itself. That sounds so simple, but it isn’t at all. I think one of the hardest things to achieve is a consonance between word and deed – allowing what we say to be an expression of who we are. I suppose that’s more the essayist’s quandry than a novelist or poet’s, but maybe not. When I “decide to write a poem”, I’ve never been successful. The few poems I’ve written that I’ve been pleased with have seemed to grow organically (!!!) and to be just a different way of expressing my understanding of this or that.
In any event – rich, and layered and good for nibbling on later are very good qualities for desserts and writing. Thanks for suggesting this one at least nudges toward the category!
Linda
Yes, metaphors are difficult. Without them the written language would be stiff and boring and with them you have a plate filled with possible misunderstandings.
But misunderstandings are not necessarily a bad thing. It results in thinking and talking.
Your blog is like the first cup of tea a quiet morning before the kids are up.
Desiree,
Your metaphor for my blog is one of the loveliest in the world. I love the morning hours myself, and know that pleasure you speak of, the quiet before the demands of the world begin to press in on us.
I love the thinking and talking that writing – especially blogging – bring about. For me, one of the greatest appeals of blogging is the true communication – the back and forth between author and reader. Each of us has our own path, but I know for a certain mine is not the one leading through years of solitude with only a manuscript for company. I’m glad such people exist – I spend a good bit of time reading what they’ve written, after all! I’m just not certain I’m one of them.
In any event, it’s always a joy to have you stop by. You’re always welcome.
Linda
Linda,
What a beautiful post! To look through your kaleidoscope is a joy, indeed. Your words tumble and turn and fall in pleasant places to reveal a delightful glimpse into the world as you see it. What colors! What shapes! Like a mosaic of poetry and prose. Thank you for sharing it with us. Oh, and I can’t wait for the next “turn”.
Blessings,
Terrie
Terrie,
Thank you so much, not only for stopping and commenting, but also for adding such lovely words to the “kaleidescopic vision”! I like what you said about the mosaic of poetry and prose. Even in essays, there can be moments of poetic langugage, and I’m beginning to appreciate that a great deal. I don’t think I’m a poet, in the sense of wanting only to sit down and write poetry, but I do love images and turns of phrase, and believe that prose can be as sparkling as the best poetry if done right. (And, of course, we’ve all come across the other side of that particular coin – the poetry that is utterly prosaic!)
I liked your poet’s corner, with the wonderful Amsterdam photo, and perhaps I’ll imagine myself there the next time I find myself heading in a poetic direction!
Linda
Kaleidoscopes is funny thingses, there is an element of dissatisfaction at work, at least in my maulers, I’m not sure I’ve ever been satisfied with the way the pattern falls.
I once submitted a poem to a forum with some very highbrow literary scholars on it B.A.s and the like.
It was a nice-ish poem after an ordinary sort.
Now one of these good and honourable doctors got hold of it and gave it a bump and a shake, just like wot you do with a kaleidoscope, and without in the least bit altering the original idea transformed my little powem into something wonderful. Most impressive.