Suzanne’s Mirror – Reflections on a Homeless Muse

 

As they say, there are things in life for which you have to “develop a taste”.  I never developed a taste for Argyle sweaters, good Scotch, foie gras or much post-modernist art, and I nearly missed out on Leonard Cohen.

When I first heard Cohen live at Rockefeller’s in Houston, I immediately thought of him as the Bob Dylan of the beret-and-brandy set.  Stringing his words one by one along a fine chain of meaning, his talent as a poet and lyricist are obvious.  His melodies are haunting and recognizable, and some of his work has enduring appeal (his Hallelujah is topping current British charts in two versions, one by Jeff Buckley and one by Alexandra Burke, recent winner of the X Factor talent competition).  But that voice!  There are times when you have to take your Dylan straight (Subterranean Homesick Blues comes to mind) and the same is true for Cohen.  But I thank my lucky stars that Judy Collins was the first to record Suzanne, and that Francoise Hardy followed suit.  Collins brought Leonard Cohen fame, and Cohen’s performance is worth hearing, but the exquisite renditions produced by both women brought me to the music and gave me a song for life.

Cohen was a poet first and a songwriter second.  Initially Suzanne was a poem, published in a 1966 collection called Parasites of Heaven.  After Collins recorded it in 1966, she was followed by Noel Harrison and then Cohen himself in 1967.  At that point, Cohen’s reputation was made and the rest  would be musical history. 

But before the fame and fortune, before the song and even before the poetry, there was a person: Suzanne Verdal.  Many think Cohen’s wife Suzanne Elrod was the inspiration for his song, but it was Verdal, the former wife of Montreal sculptor Armand Vaillancourt, who served as muse.  Though not lovers in any conventional sense, the relationship between Cohen and Verdal was extraordinarily intense and colored by the Montreal lifestyle of the time.  In an interview with Kate Saunders on BBC Radio in 1998, Suzanne herself described the mileau:

The Beat scene was beautiful.  It was live jazz and we were just dancing our hearts out for hours on end, happy on very little.  I mean we were living, most of us, on a shoestring.  Yet, there was always so much to go around, if you know what I mean.  You know, there was so much energy and sharing and inspiration and pure moments and quality times together on very little or no money.

Suzanne met Cohen while still married, but their relationship deepened after her separation from Vaillancourt:

With Leonard, it happened more in the beginning of the sixties.  When I was living then separated from Armand, I went and was very much interested in the waterfront.  The St. Lawrence River held a particular poetry and beauty to me and (I) decided to live there with our daughter, Julie.  Leonard heard about this place I was living, with crooked floors and a poetic view of the river, and he came to visit me many times.  We had tea together many times and mandarin oranges.

Reading her accounts of their time together, it’s amazing to discover how much of the song’s seemingly esoteric imagery is grounded in the mundane realities of their lives.  Not only the tea and oranges, but the river itself, Suzanne’s bohemian “rags and feathers”, the nearby church where she would light candles – all the details were caught up in Cohen’s poetic vision of their relationship.

But it wasn’t Cohen who came to her, breathless with excitement about his new creation.  According to Suzanne, “One of our mutual friends mentioned to me, ‘Did you hear the wonderful poem that Leonard wrote for you or about you?’  And I said no, because I had been away traveling and I wasn’t aware of it.  But apparently it got into the attention of Judy Collins, who urged Leonard to write a song based on the poem.”

The song being written, Suzanne never heard from Cohen again, apart from a brief meeting or two.  After a show in Minneapolis in the 1970s, he kissed her cheek during a chance encounter and said, “You gave me a beautiful song, girl.”

Their last meeting was even more poignant.  Close to her old home near the river sits Montreal’s Place Jacques-Cartier.  In the 1980s, Suzanne used to dance there, and she remembered for an interviewer that “Leonard Cohen came up to me.  I saw him in the crowd and I went up to him and I curtsied to him, and after the dance was done, he walked away.  I didn’t understand.  There was no acknowledgement from Leonard, and I did think about that for quite a while, actually.  It was rather upsetting.”

In ways I’m sure Cohen never expected and Suzanne never intended, her life has become a mixture of garbage and flowers.  Since becoming homeless, she has drifted from Venice Beach, California back to Montreal, and back again to Santa Monica. Through the course of her struggles, she has become one of the children “leaning out for love” rather than the ethereal and poetic figure who holds the mirror.

If someone else were to hold the mirror before her eyes, what might Suzanne see?  Her own words give us some sense of her perspective on how a famous, yet nearly invisible, muse experiences homelessness:

Although I have had the front row view of the mighty Pacific and the solace of my feline family and sea-gull companions, it has been an arduous task of endurance keeping mind and body safe for now on five years.  Crippling pain from a serious accident in 1999, due to multiple fractures was enough.  Then to lose my career which took a lifetime to build.  My life as a choreographer, dance instructor and massage therapist was over; indefinitely. 

Enduring this, and the peripheral loss of dignity in having to face homelessness from the inabilty to earn my financial independence, I retreated to my tiny cabin on wheels.  I was down on my luck.  The telephone was strangely silent.  there must have been something to be said of many former friends and associates who were no longer calling.  It seemed, in some folks’ judgement, that I was choosing to remain in this homeless situation, adding shame to injury.”

Reading her words, I hear the words of Cohen’s poem in a new way:

And you want to travel with her,
And you want to travel blind,
And you know that you can trust her
For she’s touched your perfect body with her mind.

Life being what it is, things do change.  While I may ponder the responsibility of a poet to his muse, and wonder about who is and isn’t traveling with Suzanne these days, there is little more I can do.  And so, I hold the mirror of my own words to the realities of Suzanne’s life, hoping, somehow, to reflect her broken body with my mind.

LOOKING GLASS

Who feared, as hope’s flowers unfolded
that blossoms might fade
with unseasonal change
and petals blow free down the wind?
Who dreamed, when love’s singing first started,
that melodies drifting
through dissonant chords
could keen like a nightbird’s last cry?
Who dared with life’s dance just beginning
to partner with fates
unaccustomed to grasp
at the swift, sudden stumbles of time?

Who wept, at the journey’s frail ending
for the path never taken,
the compass unused,
the years still untrodden, untried?

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2008 Linda L. Leinen.   All rights reserved.
COMMENTS ARE WELCOME… To leave a comment or respond to one, please click below

                

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://shoreacres.wordpress.com/2008/07/17/suzannes-mirror-reflections-on-a-homeless-muse/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

13 Comments Leave a comment.

  1. Hi, there. I enjoyed reading your poem … as if I were looking through the glass of life journey I’ve been holding in hand. Thanks, for reminding me of how important it is to draw correct decisions among the false in this laconic lifespan.
    Thank you, Linda.

    Baba,

    The poem has been around for a bit, getting tweaked here and there – until I finally realized that it belonged with Suzanne and all fell together nicely. Sometimes, there can be homeless bits of poetry and prose, too – they just need someone to find them a place to snuggle down and be secure.

    A good evening (morning? day?) to you – I must go figure the time difference so I can greet you properly!

    Linda

  2. Thanks for writing about Suzanne … I’ve often wondered who she is and where she might be these days. With all the fame and inspiration which the poem and the song have generated over the years, I feel she really deserves much better. Your question of the responsibility of the poet to his muse, or friend, for that matter, may be beyond our judgment; nevertheless, a very valid question to ponder.

    Thanks for a wonderful post and sharing with us the moving poem. Just another reason for me to elevate my esteem and regards for those who are down and out, even homeless… as I’ve just finished reading The Glass Castle, telling the true story of yet another homeless artist.

    Hello, Arti,

    Since writing this, I’ve been thinking about the relationship of artist and muse. Beyond the details of the relationship between Leonard and Suzanne, I’m completely intrigued by the reversal of expectations here. Generally, the muse is understood to be the powerful one in the relationship, capable of granting or withholding favor as she pleases. Here, the muse has become powerless while her beneficiary prospers – it’s a strange image.

    Some of the most striking passages about the loss of a muse were written by May Sarton, and even Annie Dillard has an oblique thing or two to say. Leonard Cohen never had to experience the loss of Suzanne – she was so perfectly immortalized that the song functioned for him in her absence – dare I say, “muse-ically?”

    There’s more thinking to be done, for sure. Enjoy your evening, and your weekend!

    Linda

  3. How utterly bizarre! The other day I was moved – nay, propelled – to check around on YouTube for “Suzanne” and found several videos with Judy Collins and one with her and Leonard Cohen. I haven’t even thought about this song in years.

    I have been a subscriber to Wunderground since before there were subscribers, and, frankly, never read the blogs. Except today. (The muse at work.) And there was your entry about Leonard Cohen and Suzanne which was very much appreciated.

    Nice timing. Thanks.

    Alice,

    Well, there you have it. Yet another instance of the “serendipity” that some of my readers and I spent time exploring about two months ago.

    How these things happen is amazing. Some of my best blogs have come from “chance” encounters with tiny bits of apparently random information. But, as I mentioned to someone just the other day, the operative word in the phrase “no apparent reason” is “apparent”!

    Whatever the reason, I’m so glad that you found the blog, and enjoyed the entry. Thanks for your comments and your appreciation. Please do stop by from time to time. Who knows what else from your past I’ll write about!

    Linda

  4. Things move in mysterious ways.
    I saw Cohen in concert on Oslo recently. It was fantastic – it was incredible. I have been a fan for years, and that concert was simply gorgeous. Seemingly pottering along, but with razorsharp timing and elegance; Cohen himself one big smile throughout.

    At some point someone threw a bluebell up on the stage, and not missing a beat, Cohen recitated

    Ring the bells that still can ring
    Forget your perfect offering
    There is a crack, a crack in everything
    That’s how the light gets in

    ..and then obviously sang “anthem”.

    A handful of his songs have been translated to Norwegian, translated to the female view, and sung by women. Suzanne included. It is extremely well done, to translate his deep voice and male view to a female standpoint and still keep that mysterious, beautiful prose.
    Many thanks for this post. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

    Hello, boblet,

    I’m so pleased that you enjoyed the post. I’ve always believed that enlarging the context for anything – events, artistic creation, a person -adds to understanding and the ability to appreciate what “is”. When it comes to someone as complex as Cohen, that’s especially true.

    When I was writing this, I spent a good bit of time listening to “Suzanne”, by as many artists as I could find who have recorded it. One of the intriguing characteristics of the song is its ability to evoke different images and emotions depending on the singer. Not many songs can do that, but it’s only another testament to Cohen’s genius.

    Many thanks for the visit, and the kind words~

    Linda

  5. Linda, you are a new writer?!?! Your voice is wonderful and evocative. Thank goodness you started writing!

    Good morning, Marie,

    How wonderful to have you stop by! I spent some time on your blog this morning, and sent it on to an acquaintance who has some on-going health issues. I hope it will be useful to her.

    I enjoyed this on your sidebar: “I am just like you – on the journey, putting one foot in front of the other and trying to find the best way possible to do so, with a little help from my friends.” Isn’t that just how it is? My little twist on that was the first epigram I used on my first blog. Woody Allen said, “The longest journeys begin with a single step. The best journeys begin with a moment of temporary insanity.” Now that the “beginning” of the journey is over, I’m feeling a little less insane, a little more able to relax and enjoy. I’m working on a reflection on journeying now that I’ll get posted as soon as I’m able – this week, I hope. You’ll see!

    Yes, I’m a new writer. I posted my first blog entry on another site around the end of October last year, and began at WordPress just three months ago. I’m learning lots, and one of the things I’ve learned is how wonderful readers can be!

    Thank YOU for reading, and for you very kind words. They mean a lot.

    Linda

  6. Suzanne takes you down
    to a place beside the river
    you can watch the boats that go by
    you can spend the time forever
    *
    I have good and bad memories for this song,happy and sad, how appropiate for Cohen whose every work is tinged, I have only ever heard he and Neil Diamond sing it.

    Good morning, gentledove,

    Isn’t that the way it is for so many of the truly great songs – both good memories and bad. Perhaps it’s due in part to the fact that they do endure, and remain part of our lives over time. You’re right, though – it’s especially appropriate for Cohen. He’s a master of allusion and metaphor, and so many of his songs are like pitchforks: touch them, and they resonate with memory and meaning.

    Linda

  7. Suzanne, the song hauntingly poignant. Thanks for a beautiful post. I was blog hopping and stumbled upon your blog. I’ll be back!

    teeveebee,

    Thanks so much for the read and the comment. Now that it appears Dolly is headed to south Texas and I can relax a bit, I’ll stop by and read a bit more of your own postings. So much of interest, so little time!

    Linda

  8. Hi Linda,

    Finally made it to your posting about Suzanne, and now I know the song exactly! My husband, who does know how to play the guitar, just doesn’t do it nearly often enough (another one of those ‘things’ he’ll get back to when he retires) used to play Suzanne for me. He really like the ‘folksy’ type artists when it come to guitar music. Dylan included.

    Anyway, once again, another lovely posting, and what a sad ending to a wonderful lady. I wonder what she is up to today?

    Hi, Karen,

    How nice to see you here! I’m so glad you enjoyed the post. The most recent information I could find indicated that Suzanne is still in the Santa Monica area. I am going to contact the woman who was maintaining the blog site about her and about Suzanne’s Angels and see if I can find anything more.

    It’s amazing how many of us used to play guitar, and want to get back to it “sometime”. I have a friend who just picked hers up again after decades – she says making music again is suddenly more important to her than maintaining the fancy manicure!

    Give a wave whenever you stop by – always good to see you!

    Linda

  9. Hi Linda,

    I forgot I posted here and not at Wunderground. You know the first thing to go is the mind…and the second things is….well, I’ve forgotten!

    I play the piano and I need to sit down more often and practice. I have plenty of time and loads of excuses. If I scheduled it in my day, then I would just do it. Perhaps that’s what I need to do – schedule it like I was taking lessons and HAD to practice! I have an old upright in my living room that doesn’t sound half bad. Once I sit down I can stay down for a long time, but I promised myself I would get the yard cleaned up – so that is what I am off to do!

    Karen,

    Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we did what we need to do to keep those skills honed? On the other hand, I’ve learned that as time goes on, what is important changes. Not only do I no longer practice my clarinet, I don’t even have it. For years and years – even into college, when I thought I wanted to be a music major – practicing that instrument was what I did. Now, I’m a music appreciator, and I write… just like you read and appreciate. It took me years to understand that it’s all right to move from one thing to another. As someone once said, “You can do it all – you just can’t do it all at once!”

    Linda

  10. Hi Linda,

    I absolutely loved your poem, as well as your bittersweet article about Suzanne. I was very moved by Suzanne’s story, and now I am haunted by thinking of her drifting alone, with only her felines to cushion the blows. She is a fascinating woman.

    Good morning, Michele,

    Thank you so much for your kind words about the poem, and the essay. Suzanne always has fascinated me, since I first heard Leonard Cohen’s version of the song decades ago. Discovering the reality of the woman and the historical context only makes the entire story more interesting, and, as you note – more poignant.

    There are books I read yearly, at least, and music I listen to over and again. Suzanne is one of those songs – I’m glad I helped you enjoy it a bit more. Thanks for dropping by and letting me know – please do come back!

    Linda

  11. I love all your comments. We are all artists inside our hearts that look for a golden muse…

    Loads of love to keep, share, multiply…

    Maria Lasanta,

    Thank you for your kind comments. And you are right. There is more than enough love to go around.

    Linda

  12. Dear shoreacres,

    First my excuses for this bad English message.

    My name is Ivo Winnubst from The Netherlands. A few months ago we met John (Samuelss) Cordell here in Holland. John (now 86 years old) was the man who introduced Susanne Verdal McAllistar (Vaillancourt) to Leonard Cohen in the late fifthies in Montréal Canada. Many times he asked me to look on the internet if we can find something about Suzanne and the address where he contact her. Maby you can help him? Please send a message to him ( john.cordell@kpnmail.nl) or to us. info@artivo.nl

    Hello, Ivo,

    Your English is fine. No excuses are necessary!

    Let me make some inquiries and see what I can discover. I will email you soon.

    best regards,

    Linda

  13. Because you liked the women’s renditions, Linda, have you heard Canadian K.D. Lang’s rendition of Hallelujah? It’s my favorite of them all:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_NpxTWbovE.

    I did not know about Suzanne…the song or the person. I feel like I get my education every time I visit you. :)

    Ginnie,

    I didn’t know about KD’s version until last December. When I discovered it (actually searching for something about Leonard Cohen), it became a part of a post that I may use again next Christmas, simply because it’s one of my favorites – one of those I looked at when it all was over and thought, “Did I do THAT?”

    Here’s the link to Hidden Hallelujahs.

    Thanks so much!

    Linda


Leave a Comment